The Not So Obvious Reason for Shooting RAW

I shot RAW+JPEG for many years but recently switched to RAW only. Why? That’s the questions I’m going to answer in this post.

As it is the case for many beginners in photography, I was not yet very familiar with post-processing tools and techniques. I focused on producing the best pictures possible within the camera and shooting JPEGs seemed to be the logical choice. Plus, the arguments in favor of that format are convincing:

  • The JPEG format is widely accepted
  • My camera produces JPEGs of good quality
  • JPEGs can instantly be shared with friends and family
  • JPEGs are compressed and smaller in size, so it’s easier and cheaper to store them
  • I use the ART Filters of my Olympus camera from time to time and they require JPEG

RAW+JPEG – The Great Compromise

Eventually, I wanted to learn how to post-process my photos, though. I knew that I will be better off with the RAW format when that time comes. There are no doubts that RAW files provide way more flexibility compared to compressed JPEGs.

So I settled for RAW+JPEG as a “future-proof” compromise. I was happy with my decision and up until today, I don’t see anything wrong with it. I had all my photos available in the JPEG format when I needed them and I could still use the RAW files in post-processing at a later time.

Over the years I got better at photo editing and used my RAW files more often. Yet, it was not like the JPEGs were in my way. I would pick the RAW file out of a RAW+JPEG pair, edit it, and save it as a separate JPEG or TIFF next to the original photo. The times I had a good use for my JPEGs were very, very rare, though. Most often I would just work with the RAW files now. My JPEG versions became more and more obsolete.

Improved Workflow with RAW…

So, what led me to fully embrace RAW and abandon the JPEG format altogether? It was a little limitation in how Apple Photos worked with my favorite photo editor, Affinity Photo: With the newest version of Apple Photos – released alongside macOS High Sierra in late September of 2017 – we can send photos directly from Photos to external editors. All one has to do is to right-click on the photo, select an app from the menu under Edit With, and boom… the photo is ready to be edited in the third-party software.

There’s a small, annoying problem with this workflow, though. While Apple Photos is good at keeping RAW+JPEG pairs together, it always shows the JPEG «on top» of the RAW. Because of that, transferring a photo would send the JPEG to the photo editor rather than the RAW file. Obviously, that’s not what I want. With a single RAW photo, however, that problem doesn’t exist anymore. With one click, I can now send the RAW file directly from Photos to Affinity Photo (or any other photo editing software).

Update, May 2018: I have since switched from Apple Photos to Lightroom. The problem described above doesn’t exist in Lightroom, yet I still shoot RAW only because of all other workflow advantages.

…And All the Benefits of JPEG

But wait… what about all the benefits of JPEG? Is it really worth to ignore them just for a slightly easier workflow? Good question! I thought long and hard about it and came to the conclusion, that I don’t give anything up by shooting RAW only. Here’s why:

  • Instantly sharing photos? No problem! All cameras usually embed a low-resolution JPEG in a RAW file. It’s what you see on the camera screen after the photo was taken and also in most file managers upon import. In my case (i.e. with the Olympus OM-D E-M5 II) that thumbnail has a dimension of 3200×2400 pixels and is quite compressed. But let’s face it, that quality is good enough for sharing the photo on social media platforms. Better yet, when importing RAW photos to Apple Photos’ library on a Mac, Photos will render a full-size JPEG and store it in the cloud (alongside the original RAW). All this happens without the need to shoot in RAW+JPEG or to develop the RAW first.
  • Shooting with ART Filters or in scene modes? Yes, in-camera filters aren’t applied to RAW files. But my Olympus camera knows about this limitation and switches to RAW+JPEG when I select such modes. Also — and some Olympus aren’t aware of this — it’s possible to apply any Olympus ART Filter to any Olympus RAW by using the Olympus Viewer software. In fact, applying ART Filters to RAW files in post-processing is a much more flexible approach.
  • Okay, but what about the out-of-camera JPEGs you like so much? It’s time-consuming to develop RAW files and you’ll never get the same results as in-camera, right? Yes, that is a valid point. I still believe that the Olympus JPEGs are really, really good. Eventually, though, I got to the point where I am comfortable producing my own styles by processing the photos myself. I also think that the JPEGs Apple Photos automatically renders from my RAW files don’t differ too much from my out-of-camera JPEGs.

Conclusion

In the end, whether to shoot RAW, JPEG, or RAW+JPEG is a personal preference and depends on the individual’s workflow. To make the best decision, however, it is important to understand all the pros and cons of the two formats. As for me, RAW only fits better into my current workflow. I felt liberated when I gave up shooting RAW+JPEG.

Published on September 29, 2017
Apple Photos / Photo Management / Post-Processing



This article reflects my own opinion. I am not directly paid by any company creating the products I write about and I never received any free software or gear from them. This post may include affiliate links to products offered in the MacOS and iOS app stores, on Adobe.com, and on Amazon.com, among others. If you buy software or gear using these links, I receive a small commission that helps keeping this blog running. For you, the price of the product will remain the same and everybody wins.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.